{"id":194,"date":"2020-08-24T09:06:00","date_gmt":"2020-08-24T09:06:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/epo2023.appletest.com.au\/?p=194"},"modified":"2023-10-26T09:09:42","modified_gmt":"2023-10-26T09:09:42","slug":"what-the-outcome-of-the-mondelez-case-means-for-your-business","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.epayoffice.com.au\/what-the-outcome-of-the-mondelez-case-means-for-your-business\/","title":{"rendered":"What the Outcome of the Mondelez Case Means For Your Business"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

On Thursday, 13 August 2020, the High Court made a landmark decision regarding the case between Mondelez Australia Pty Ltd and the Australian Manufacturing Workers Union (AMWU).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The dispute involved two employees at Mondelez\u2019 Cadbury food manufacturing plant in Tasmania. In particular, the company\u2019s method of calculating the accruing and taking of paid personal\/carer\u2019s leave.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

At the time, the two employee\u2019s in question were working three 12-hour shifts per week, while other employees were working five 7.2 hour shifts per week. Both employee groups worked the same 36 hours per week.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Under the company\u2019s enterprise agreement, the 12-hour shift employees were receiving 96 hours (eight days) of paid personal leave per annum. When one such employee would take paid personal leave, it would deduct 12 hours from their total amount of accrued leave.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, both the employees and the AMWU argued this agreement provided less than what is set out in Section 96 of the Fair Work Act, which states:<\/p>\n\n\n\n